Re: Getting a vintage tram system going in Melbourne
brgamble
Saturday, December 8, 2001 9:22 AM
Which basically means finding good homes for a lot of stuff that is
otherwise likely either to be scrapped or sold to the highest bidder
overseas?
--- In TramsDownUnder@y..., "Greg King" <tramway@a...> wrote:
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Promise to Quit
Nicotrol will help
http://us.click.yahoo.com/5vN8tD/AqSDAA/ySSFAA/DiTxlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
otherwise likely either to be scrapped or sold to the highest bidder
overseas?
--- In TramsDownUnder@y..., "Greg King" <tramway@a...> wrote:
Hi Guys,has
Just for those who are concerned about old cars etc., a system that
something like 260 MILES of track, two routes operated by W's willfit in
just fine, as discussed elsewhere, other systems can quite happilyrun old
cars with new, I just wish this could be dropped out of theequation. The
W's (albeit modified) WILL return. What we should be focussing onis the
fact that cars that have not had the modifications done (read allother cars
than the 53 modified W's) will NOT be allowed to run in publicservice as
the paranioa is so well entrenched now as to be impossible toremove with
common sense. Our aim should be to have the Thornbury depot madethe mueseum
with the operation as I suggested to merry Creek with the reservesection
and always operated with a crew of two, this is the only way I cansee any
heritage cars running again. The current plans for the museum isfocussing
on a NON running museum combined with the railways at Newport. Thatwould be
a dissaster!distracting
GregG'day Peter E.My message 1205 was meant to address these
issues,interesting though they are.I feel sure that once we have WsCars will be
operating in service again that they, along with the Restaurant
an effective precedent to occasional[at least]operation of theheritage
fleet.In the short term the operators may have enough troubleaccepting W
class operation,I am reassured by Greg Kings message 1218 re Wmodification
and training.I would be concerned that Yarra and M might resistfurther
developements out of bloodymindedness if it is pushed too soon.Thatdoesn't
mean that we shouldn't be thinking,planning and working towardssome form of
heritage operation,maybe along the lines of TrolleyWeek.Peter,Murph tells
me you havn't been to Melb.,it would be good to see you outhere.Regards to
all,Peter Bruce.--- In TramsDownUnder@y..., "Peter D. Ehrlich"
<norcalrr@s...> wrote:
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Promise to Quit
Nicotrol will help
http://us.click.yahoo.com/5vN8tD/AqSDAA/ySSFAA/DiTxlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/