Re: SW2 426

jebounds <[email protected]>
Monday, December 9, 2002 1:16 PM

--- In [email protected], "Roy Winslow" <rwinslow@b...>
wrote:
426 is an SW2. I was unaware that it had swapped numbers, but this
tram was
definately converted direct from W1 426 to SW2 426 according to
Destination
City (1938?). I remember a photo of as new W1 426 published in the
TMSV
Running Journal of early 1970's vintage, and a;ways thought this
was the
same tram as that running in Perth.

Whilst on the subject of PETS, it is with profound disappointment
that I
advise that the Whiteman Park Tramway has been forced to cease
operations as
of last tram yesterday until we are able to find affordable Public
Liability
Imdemnity Insurance. Last tram to run was W2 393.

We hope services can resume shortly with the imminent changing of
the
State's Insurance Laws to allow voluntary groups such as PETS to
obtain
appropriate government insurance.

Cheers

Roy Winslow
-----Original Message-----
From: gm4201@i... [mailto:gm4201@i...]
Sent: Monday, 9 December 2002 11:15 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [TramsDownUnder] SW2 426


A question about SW2 426 which is with PETS in Western Australia.
According to the lists I have 406 and 426 swapped numbers during
construction.
The tram which started out as 406 and became 426 I have listed
as a W2,
converted from W. The tram which started out as 426 and became
406 I have
as an
SW2, converted from W1.
Was the second 426 converted from W2 to SW2 or is the tram in
Perth the
original 426 which became 406?
Thanks for any help.
Regards,
Chris
S.
It was 364 & 422 which exchanged numbers.
Jeff


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT




Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.




Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙