Re: SW2 426
jebounds <[email protected]>
Monday, December 9, 2002 1:16 PM
--- In [email protected], "Roy Winslow" <rwinslow@b...>
wrote:
Jeff
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
wrote:
426 is an SW2. I was unaware that it had swapped numbers, but thistram was
definately converted direct from W1 426 to SW2 426 according toDestination
City (1938?). I remember a photo of as new W1 426 published in theTMSV
Running Journal of early 1970's vintage, and a;ways thought thiswas the
same tram as that running in Perth.that I
Whilst on the subject of PETS, it is with profound disappointment
advise that the Whiteman Park Tramway has been forced to ceaseoperations as
of last tram yesterday until we are able to find affordable PublicLiability
Imdemnity Insurance. Last tram to run was W2 393.the
We hope services can resume shortly with the imminent changing of
State's Insurance Laws to allow voluntary groups such as PETS toobtain
appropriate government insurance.as a W2,
Cheers
Roy Winslow
-----Original Message-----
From: gm4201@i... [mailto:gm4201@i...]
Sent: Monday, 9 December 2002 11:15 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [TramsDownUnder] SW2 426
A question about SW2 426 which is with PETS in Western Australia.
According to the lists I have 406 and 426 swapped numbers during
construction.
The tram which started out as 406 and became 426 I have listed
converted from W. The tram which started out as 426 and became406 I have
as anPerth the
SW2, converted from W1.
Was the second 426 converted from W2 to SW2 or is the tram in
original 426 which became 406?It was 364 & 422 which exchanged numbers.
Thanks for any help.
Regards,
Chris
S.
Jeff
Service.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/