Re: Hawthorn Update/Melb Tram depot questions
trampanto
Wednesday, August 7, 2002 1:10 AM
--- In TramsDownUnder@y..., "swashau" <swash@b...> wrote:
Sorry, typo, it is meant to be PAST not post.
On further inspection today, track has been laid to the first shed,
with rail leading into all four doors. This shed has retained it's
original length. There was work being undertaken to connect track to
the second shed, which only looks long enough to store one car each
(ie W clas length). The "new" track appears to have been dumped in a
pile, lots of workmen standing around trying to work out what was
what. Is this track the original track from the depot? It looked to
be on the used side.
DingDing
Jack
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Free $5 Love Reading
Risk Free!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/09Lw8C/PfREAA/Ey.GAA/DiTxlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
What is that post Hawthorn stuff about? I have no idea.
Sorry, typo, it is meant to be PAST not post.
On further inspection today, track has been laid to the first shed,
with rail leading into all four doors. This shed has retained it's
original length. There was work being undertaken to connect track to
the second shed, which only looks long enough to store one car each
(ie W clas length). The "new" track appears to have been dumped in a
pile, lots of workmen standing around trying to work out what was
what. Is this track the original track from the depot? It looked to
be on the used side.
DingDing
Jack
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Free $5 Love Reading
Risk Free!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/09Lw8C/PfREAA/Ey.GAA/DiTxlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/