Re: Destination City
pn1.rm
Sunday, June 23, 2002 10:25 PM
Of course he did, Peter, but that was 17 years ago. It was a
wonderful snapshot of the system as it was. An update would be an
interesting comparison.But, considering the size of the system and
the interest it generates, Melbourne is still poorly documented.
Paul in Melbourne
--- In TramsDownUnder@y..., "pvawser" <pnvawser@b...> wrote:
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Free $5 Love Reading
Risk Free!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/3PCXaC/PfREAA/Ey.GAA/DiTxlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
wonderful snapshot of the system as it was. An update would be an
interesting comparison.But, considering the size of the system and
the interest it generates, Melbourne is still poorly documented.
Paul in Melbourne
--- In TramsDownUnder@y..., "pvawser" <pnvawser@b...> wrote:
--- In TramsDownUnder@y..., "pn1.rm" <pn1@b...> wrote:I am sure David Keenan would do a wonderful job writing upHe did. In 1985. "Melbourne Tramways".
Melbourne trams.
--
Peter Vawser
pnvawser@b...
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Free $5 Love Reading
Risk Free!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/3PCXaC/PfREAA/Ey.GAA/DiTxlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/