Re: Tramway Culture

jebounds
Sunday, June 16, 2002 3:02 PM

--- In TramsDownUnder@y..., "pn1.rm" <pn1@b...> wrote:
Perhaps it was different at each Depot. Camberwell rather "middle
class". Peter Winspur was an Inspector in my time and he was fairly
formal (although always very professional). He always referred to
people as "Mr" although he would address you by your first name if
he
was talking to you about "enthusiast" matters. But I think the "Mr"
thing was already part of the "culture" at Ballarat.
I am sure the term "Mr" was also widely used on the MMTB two way
radio (not that the "platform staff" got to hear it often!).
The Melbourne tramway "culture" is fascinating. I was talking to
Graeme Turnbull recently. He is doing a PhD thesis on Sir Robert
Risson and his research has unearthed some real gems of "tramway
culture" (some of which can't be published I believe!). But, I do
hope his thesis eventually becomes a book.
Paul in Melbourne
paul,i believe the staffing of the mmtb was run on military command
system from inception as most of their early inspectors were former
army nco's.jeff

--- In TramsDownUnder@y..., "demondriver44" <demondriver44@y...>
wrote:
My tramway career was 1966 to 1977 and I never remember calling
anyone Mr.,all traffic officers up to and including the District
Inspector[if you knew him well enough]were known by their first
name
which doesn't mean that they were given no respect,that depended
on
how well they did their job.The "A" shift Depot starter at South
Melbourne/Hanna St.was Frank Reardon and he was universally
respected
and well loved,he really looked after his crews and they looked
after
him and the depot ran like clockwork with very little lost
mileage
on
our shift,most of our line inspectors were the same,maybe not
quite
because Frank was one out of the box,all the same our roads ran
pretty well.The Depot Master was known as Boss to most trammies
and
very occasionally Mr. to some suck or new employee unsure of
themselves,the old timers taught you not to give undue
respect,they
were mostly good staunch people who really did their job and
taught
you how to do yours.In a lot of ways it was a really good job,it
was
an education for me and I think many like me.PBruce.P.S if you
didn't
address someone,an officer, by their first name you spoke
impersonally but,as I say,not disrespectfully. --- In
TramsDownUnder@y..., "Swash" <swash@b...> wrote:
In 1979 DI's were still referred to as Mr by most staff. Other
officers were usually referred to by their first name, once one
knew
them well enough, otherwise one did not use their name. Even now
some still use Mr, but almost in a joking way. It occurs to me
that
it is not such a bad thing in that it would be a good way to
separate
when you are communicating in a serious way, ie with an officer
at
fleet operations, or his first name when you see him at the depot
and
stop to chat. After many years experience, it can be difficult to
stand your ground against management, who may have been 'on the
job'
less years, and with whom you are quite good friends otherwise.

AC.
----- Original Message -----
From: pn1.rm
To: TramsDownUnder@y...
Sent: Saturday, June 15, 2002 5:36 PM
Subject: [TramsDownUnder] Tramway Culture


Interesting to see that old "trammie" culture is alive and
well
even
on this list with former employees referring to others
as "Mr".
In my time at Camberwell (1974-1976) the DIs (District
Inspectors)
were always referred to as "Mr". I think even among the men
in
green.
Can't remember what we called the starters and the
inspectors.
Can
any old trammie enlighten me?
The practice was maintained at the Ballarat tramway museum
with
many
of the volunteers referring to each other as "Mr" rather than
by
their Christian names.
Paul in Melbourne


Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Free $5 Love Reading
Risk Free!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/3PCXaC/PfREAA/Ey.GAA/DiTxlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙