Re: Re: Getting a vintage tram system going in Melbourne
IS Edit
Saturday, December 8, 2001 12:27 PM
I refuse to concede that older cars in good operating order cannot mix
safely with modern cars.
Bob Murphy
----- Original Message -----
From: "brgamble" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2001 8:22 PM
Subject: [TramsDownUnder] Re: Getting a vintage tram system going in
Melbourne
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Stop Smoking Now
Nicotrol will help
http://us.click.yahoo.com/2vN8tD/_pSDAA/ySSFAA/DiTxlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
safely with modern cars.
Bob Murphy
----- Original Message -----
From: "brgamble" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2001 8:22 PM
Subject: [TramsDownUnder] Re: Getting a vintage tram system going in
Melbourne
Which basically means finding good homes for a lot of stuff that is
otherwise likely either to be scrapped or sold to the highest bidder
overseas?
--- In TramsDownUnder@y..., "Greg King" <tramway@a...> wrote:Hi Guys,has
Just for those who are concerned about old cars etc., a system thatsomething like 260 MILES of track, two routes operated by W's willfit injust fine, as discussed elsewhere, other systems can quite happilyrun oldcars with new, I just wish this could be dropped out of theequation. TheW's (albeit modified) WILL return. What we should be focussing onis thefact that cars that have not had the modifications done (read allother carsthan the 53 modified W's) will NOT be allowed to run in publicservice asthe paranioa is so well entrenched now as to be impossible toremove withcommon sense. Our aim should be to have the Thornbury depot madethe mueseumwith the operation as I suggested to merry Creek with the reservesectionand always operated with a crew of two, this is the only way I cansee anyheritage cars running again. The current plans for the museum isfocussingon a NON running museum combined with the railways at Newport. Thatwould bea dissaster!distracting
GregG'day Peter E.My message 1205 was meant to address theseissues,interesting though they are.I feel sure that once we have WsCars will be
operating in service again that they, along with the Restaurantan effective precedent to occasional[at least]operation of theheritagefleet.In the short term the operators may have enough troubleaccepting Wclass operation,I am reassured by Greg Kings message 1218 re Wmodificationand training.I would be concerned that Yarra and M might resistfurtherdevelopements out of bloodymindedness if it is pushed too soon.Thatdoesn'tmean that we shouldn't be thinking,planning and working towardssome form ofheritage operation,maybe along the lines of TrolleyWeek.Peter,Murph tellsme you havn't been to Melb.,it would be good to see you outhere.Regards toall,Peter Bruce.--- In TramsDownUnder@y..., "Peter D. Ehrlich"
<norcalrr@s...> wrote:
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Stop Smoking Now
Nicotrol will help
http://us.click.yahoo.com/2vN8tD/_pSDAA/ySSFAA/DiTxlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/