Re: Re: Getting a vintage tram system going in Melbourne
IS Edit
Saturday, December 8, 2001 12:26 PM
You couldn't get much dumber than a Melbourne tramway museum isolated from
the biggest tramway in the southern hemisphere.
Bob Murphy
----- Original Message -----
From: "Greg King" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2001 7:38 PM
Subject: Re: [TramsDownUnder] Re: Getting a vintage tram system going in
Melbourne
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Stop Smoking Now
Nicotrol will help
http://us.click.yahoo.com/2vN8tD/_pSDAA/ySSFAA/DiTxlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
the biggest tramway in the southern hemisphere.
Bob Murphy
----- Original Message -----
From: "Greg King" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2001 7:38 PM
Subject: Re: [TramsDownUnder] Re: Getting a vintage tram system going in
Melbourne
Hi Guys,cars
Just for those who are concerned about old cars etc., a system that has
something like 260 MILES of track, two routes operated by W's will fit in
just fine, as discussed elsewhere, other systems can quite happily run old
cars with new, I just wish this could be dropped out of the equation. The
W's (albeit modified) WILL return. What we should be focussing on is the
fact that cars that have not had the modifications done (read all other
than the 53 modified W's) will NOT be allowed to run in public service asmueseum
the paranioa is so well entrenched now as to be impossible to remove with
common sense. Our aim should be to have the Thornbury depot made the
with the operation as I suggested to merry Creek with the reserve sectionbe
and always operated with a crew of two, this is the only way I can see any
heritage cars running again. The current plans for the museum is focussing
on a NON running museum combined with the railways at Newport. That would
a dissaster!be
GregG'day Peter E.My message 1205 was meant to address these distractingissues,interesting though they are.I feel sure that once we have Ws
operating in service again that they, along with the Restaurant Cars will
an effective precedent to occasional[at least]operation of the heritagemodification
fleet.In the short term the operators may have enough trouble accepting W
class operation,I am reassured by Greg Kings message 1218 re W
and training.I would be concerned that Yarra and M might resist furtherdoesn't
developements out of bloodymindedness if it is pushed too soon.That
mean that we shouldn't be thinking,planning and working towards some formof
heritage operation,maybe along the lines of Trolley Week.Peter,Murph tellsto
me you havn't been to Melb.,it would be good to see you out here.Regards
all,Peter Bruce.--- In TramsDownUnder@y..., "Peter D. Ehrlich"
<norcalrr@s...> wrote:
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Stop Smoking Now
Nicotrol will help
http://us.click.yahoo.com/2vN8tD/_pSDAA/ySSFAA/DiTxlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/