Re: Re: Running Ws & Other Old Cars In Service
IS Edit
Thursday, December 6, 2001 12:37 AM
Bruce:
I agree with the need for such a group and even the general idea of the name
but it needs to be shorter so it sticks in people's minds to increase
branding power so "Melbourne Tramways Trust" would be much better. The other
is too long and not necessary even though it plays to the historical name of
the M&MTB.
Most people didn't even know what M&MTB stood for.
Any organisation we set up to improve things here should be memorable and
obfuscating with extraneous words/concepts in a title would not be an
auspicious start.
Cheers,
Bob Murphy
----- Original Message -----
From: "brgamble" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 9:12 AM
Subject: [TramsDownUnder] Re: Running Ws & Other Old Cars In Service
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Tiny Wireless Camera under $80!
Order Now! FREE VCR Commander!
Click Here - Only 1 Day Left!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/75YKVC/7.PDAA/ySSFAA/DiTxlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
I agree with the need for such a group and even the general idea of the name
but it needs to be shorter so it sticks in people's minds to increase
branding power so "Melbourne Tramways Trust" would be much better. The other
is too long and not necessary even though it plays to the historical name of
the M&MTB.
Most people didn't even know what M&MTB stood for.
Any organisation we set up to improve things here should be memorable and
obfuscating with extraneous words/concepts in a title would not be an
auspicious start.
Cheers,
Bob Murphy
----- Original Message -----
From: "brgamble" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 9:12 AM
Subject: [TramsDownUnder] Re: Running Ws & Other Old Cars In Service
I'm following this thread keenly. It may be of interest that here in
Auckland there is the recently incorporated the "Auckland Electric
Tramways Trust": brief to act as a supporter and "ginger" group for
Ak's tramway (and other urban transport) heritage - main focus MOTAT
at present. The name is a play on the old Auckland Electric Tramways
Co Ltd (which coy has recently been reactivated by a member).
If a tinpot place like Auckland (with essentially no effective public
transport) can get some folk together, why not Melbourne. Why not
the "Melbourne and Metropolitan Tramways Trust"? Or are the gunzels
in control? And btw, I am the NZ member of the COTMA executive, so
you'd better watch out, ha ha ha.
--- In TramsDownUnder@y..., "Greg King" <tramway@a...> wrote:Hi John,accept your
You have hit the nail right on the head in every aspect, I evencritique of what I said about the gutterliners but, it was tostress apoint. You are absolutely right in the need for a vocal focus groupand YOUare well aware of lack of co-operation between groups andindividuals, notjust trams, but trains, buses, you name it. The tramway museumcould havehad the best operation in the world a few years ago but, they werescaredthey would'nt be able to play trams whenever they wanted, to theloss of thepreservation movement also, because of their attitudes (and youknow thegunzels I elude to) they have no respect (and deservedly so) fromgovernmentor the companies. As for the fare collection, again, guilty ascharged, it'sa half arsed system loosely based on European practise, thedifference is,in Europe it works, I know why but it would take all night toexplain andget us nowhere. I have contacted Bob Murphy off list and somethingMAYhappen in the future, keep in touch off line, it's very sensitiveand I haveto tread carefully due to my position, Muni has the Market StreetRailwaygroup, maybe we can have a Bourke Street Railway group!! Betterstill, howabout a group called the Melbourne and Metropolitan TramwaysBoard????????are an
By the way, don't sell yourself short, as far as I'm concerned youhonourary Melbournianenough time
GregWhile I am not a full time Melbourian, I have and do spendthere to be able to understand what is going on there. One thingthat isdefinitely missing in Melbourne is fan and enthusiast support forthetrams. Oh yeah, they all do a lot of talking, but when it comesto "Put Upor Shut Up", they shut up. It is almost like Philadelphia - therearezillions of fans, but none of them can get their act together.Melbournedrastically needs an organization like Market Street Railway inS.F. topull together most of the fansto put pressure on the Government andtheoperating tram companies. There is a tremendous amount ofinfighting amongtram fans inAustralia, and getting one faction to agree withanother is likemediating a war cease-fire. Some like the Ws while others hatethem andcall the ones who do like them idiots, some like the new cars,whilecertain others (mainly a few in Sydney - and I'm sure many willknow who Imean) think that only their views are valid. And to Greg, while Iof your
certainly respect you and your views, I do think that the majoritypassengers would much rather be on a tram than a gutterliner.It's justthat the apathy in Melbourne is legendary. And don't even get mestarted onfare evasion. The Government and the operators have brought thatentirefiasco on themselves, and short of changing the entire system to aPAYEoperation with front entrance and center exit cars (and evenembracing that"awful American and Canadian system" of fareboxes - which doeswork even onsuper heavy loading routes - and has for eons), the fare evasionwill notstop. Melbourne had a chance to go to a PAYE farebox system withthe Z1and Z2 trams, let it slip a little with the Z3s, and thenabsolutely blewit with the As and Bs. One man operation cannot, and in myopinion, willnot ever work with all those wide open doors. It has become asport to seehow often you can ride without ever paying a fare. I know peoplewho havenot paid a fare in three years! It is remarkably easy to beat thesystem,with just a little bit of effort and inconvenience. The "officialline"fare evasion rate of approx. 12% is absurd - all one has to do isride alot and it is obvious that well over 50% of tram passengers have noto be used
intention of buying a ticket, and if they do have one it is onlywhen inspectors get on the tram. When one does get on, there isalways amad dash to the validators and ticket machines. Anyway, back to thetheirmoney
subject -- All the Melbourne fans have to get together and putand their efforts where their mouths are. There are 200 Ws atNewport andPreston just waiting for a chance to get out and stretch their legsagain.200 extra trams would draw a whole heck of a lotof passengers backto publictransport. ++++++++++++ John Engleman
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Tiny Wireless Camera under $80!
Order Now! FREE VCR Commander!
Click Here - Only 1 Day Left!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/75YKVC/7.PDAA/ySSFAA/DiTxlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/