Re: Re: Canberra- CAF
  TP

Something from Transport Canberra just flashed up on my social media with a
comment that the light rail (now 5 years old) is carrying 20% of ACT public
transport patronage - which would thus be about 16 million per annum. Not a
public transport city much.

Tony P

On Friday 19 April 2024 at 13:40:13 UTC+10 Matthew Geier wrote:

> The Newcastle line is actually shorter than the Sydney Tramway Museum's

> route!

>

> And it doesn't help that for many months they have been down one tram, so

> they have no operational spare, so when one of the remaining cars has to go

> in for it's regular inspection, they have to cut back the service frequency.

>

> This will not be endearing itself to prospective users.

>

> Hop off the train, walk over to the tram platform, find the next service

> is in 20 minutes, so you walk instead and still get to your destination

> before the tram would.

>

>

> On 19/4/24 11:59, Bob Pearce wrote:

>

> Well I guess it has to start somewhere.

>

>

>

> Newcastle, I’m surprised, hasn’t done anything to shore up its existence.

>

>

>

> It was I think always going to be a white elephant. My one regret was not

> having travelled to Newcastle by train when the line actually went to the

> city.

>

>

>

> Did the cutback achieve the BS put out when it was done other than to line

> the pockets of the developers?

>

>

>

> *From:*tramsdo...@... tramsdo...@...> *On

> Behalf Of *TP

> *Sent:* Friday, April 19, 2024 9:54 AM

> *To:* TramsDownUnder tramsdo...@...>

> *Subject:* [TramsDownUnder] Re: Canberra- CAF

>

>

>

> Oh, and the patronage is about 3.2 million per annum, the lowest of any

> Australian tram route except for Newcastle. It probably attracts more

> people than any Canberra bus route though. The vast majority of Canberrans

> drive. One has to start somewhere.

>

>

>

> Tony P

>

>

>

> On Friday 19 April 2024 at 11:49:14 UTC+10 TP wrote:

>

> Mal, it is well-operated, (as one would expect from a German operator) but

> there are barely any curves in the route and the couple there are have very

> generous radius. CAFs and Citadis are suitable for such routes. The debate

> is about their suitability for routes that have lots of sharp corners.

>

>

>

> Tony P

>

>

>

> On Thursday 18 April 2024 at 16:49:56 UTC+10 Malcolm Rowe wrote:

>

> I am impressed.

>

>

>

> Canberra seems to me to encapsulate everything that a light rail system

> should be.

>

>

>

> The service is fast and smooth with priority at traffic lights and

> complete track segregation. Even when the track swings over to the side of

> the road for depot access it is under traffic light control with priority.

>

>

>

> There was no sign of rough ride or wheel squeal on curves. It seems that

> fixed truck trams can work if the track geometry is designed for them.

>

> Speed and acceleration was good - with the trams running just below

> the local speed limits of either 60 or 70 km/h as measured with my mobile

> phone app.

>

>

>

> Here are a couple of pics - both in Flemington Rd. The overhead structure

> is not overdone. Ignore the apparent sharp curves - that's due to me using

> a telephoto lens.

>

>

>

> Mal Rowe - who has a bit more respect for CAF design in the right setting.

>

>

>

> On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 10:19 PM Malcolm Rowe mal....@...> wrote:

>

> Today's pic shows CAF 14 at the Civic terminus in Canberra.

>

> I'm planning to have a ride tomorrow.

>

>

>

> --

>

> Mal Rowe - AU

>

>

>

>

> --

>

> Mal Rowe - AU

>

> --

> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

> "TramsDownUnder" group.

> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an

> email totramsdownunde...@....

> To view this discussion on the web visit

> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tramsdownunder/d919ef29-8e92-4035-a6fa-3a38f9dd56fcn%40googlegroups.com

> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tramsdownunder/d919ef29-8e92-4035-a6fa-3a38f9dd56fcn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer

> .

> --

> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

> "TramsDownUnder" group.

> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an

> email totramsdownunde...@....

>

> To view this discussion on the web visit

> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tramsdownunder/!%26!AAAAAAAAAAAYAAAAAAAAANRI7VTqU3JFnERogu%2BjMZDCgAAAEAAAALyNHIMejkxMla9mbLru5g4BAAAAAA%3D%3D%40iinet.net.au

> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tramsdownunder/!%26!AAAAAAAAAAAYAAAAAAAAANRI7VTqU3JFnERogu%2BjMZDCgAAAEAAAALyNHIMejkxMla9mbLru5g4BAAAAAA%3D%3D%40iinet.net.au?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer

> .

>

>