Anti-tram crap recycled from 70 years ago, nothing else.

The “flexibility of buses” line is bogus if they’re touting an optically guided vehicle, as the alleged ”trackless tram’s (eg bus's)“ selling point is it is guided without the need for rails. So they can’t make up their minds about what they are shills for, guided certainty or steered flexibility.

Even the term “trackless tram” isn’t new, it was originally an alternate name for trolley buses.

Anyway, the vehemently anti-tram tone of this screed says it all, they are not promoting a purportedly better alternative they are just having a typical anti-tram rant, like the NRMA and RACV once produced.

A poor effort, marked with the big red F.

Tony

> On 23 Feb 2024, at 11:08, Jeremy Wainwright jewiwa@...> wrote:

>

> and the wonderful 'trackless trams' get a mention!

>

> JWW

> --

> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TramsDownUnder" group.

> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email totramsdownunder+unsubscribe@... mailto:tramsdownunder+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tramsdownunder/PU4P216MB1070A57A97B56A638B65F9B5C8552%40PU4P216MB1070.KORP216.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tramsdownunder/PU4P216MB1070A57A97B56A638B65F9B5C8552%40PU4P216MB1070.KORP216.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer.

> <CT 240223.pdf>