Re: Ron # 71 - L101. F201
  Michael Giddey

The MCB type trucks with their equaliser bars would have given a superior riding quality compared to the more basic suspension on the Brill 27 and 77 designs.

Sent from Outlook

From:tramsdownunder@... tramsdownunder@...> on behalf of Mal Rowe mal.rowe@...>
Sent: Monday, 5 April 2021 12:05 AM
To:tramsdownunder@... tramsdownunder@...>
Subject: Re: [TramsDownUnder] Ron # 71 - L101. F201

On 04/04/2021 18:44, Anthony Dudley Horscroft wrote:

> Now the question is, why was the L class design considered too

> expensive so the MMTB built the W1 class?


The L was built by James Moore and Co. The company was a large timber
merchant based in City Rd South Melbourne and were the first company to
build electric trams in Melbourne.

They were very proud of their work and their timber - using the highest
quality and the most complex joints to show it at its best. They aimed
to impress - firstly with what became the B class and then the Ls.

Those joints were largely due to the complex curves in the body. See the
pic attached, showing the drop centre of L 103 at MTPA, Haddon.

One of the ways the MMTB saved money on the W design was to simplify the
shapes - with straight panels - enabling mass production of timber parts
rather than hand fitted wood pieces as in the L.

James Moore did build Ws - but the craftmanship required was well below
what they put into the Ls.

A second was probably to go for licensed manufacture of a mass market
MCB type truck design rather than the Brill 77E.

Mal Rowe - who thinks that the original MCB pattern truck probably came
from American Locomotive Co of New York.

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TramsDownUnder" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email totramsdownunder+unsubscribe@....
To view this discussion on the web visit