It's just the same mash of the English language as those railway and
tramway "loops"-that-aren't.

Tony P

On Friday, 15 February 2019 20:22:11 UTC+11, bblunt wrote:
>

> In view of previous pedantic debates, I am at a loss to see how a tram

> that has to reverse direction twice to get back where it came from can be

> considered to be in a loop?

>

> Brian

>