Re: "foreign" systems

In a message dated 29 Oct 2001 @ 1355 PDT "Matthew Austin"
<[email protected]> wrote:

Paul wrote...

I think discussion of foreign systems, especially from
an Australian perspective, is appropriate.

I agree. I had alot of fun in Hong Kong and Rome earlier this year. Their
ways of doing things are fascinating to one used to Melbourne...

Matt

And now a word from the listowner:

Discussion of "foreign" systems is fine on this list, as long as the subject
line includes "TAN" (for Tangent) or "OT" (for Off-Topic). But keep the
threads relatively short, please!

As the recently closed poll indicated, occasional discussion of such
non-TramsDownUnder systems such as Hong Kong and Calcutta is warranted.
While there were more votes for keeping it "TramsDownUnder" with the
occasional Hong Kong/Calcutta post allowable (a move I personally favored),
the next biggest block of votes wanted to open the group up for their
specific inclusion. Only one voter chose "Keep it 'TramsDownUnder'."

So, gang--please be guided accordingly. I love to see these posts,
especially from the perspective of an Australian or New Zealander.

Thanks.

Milantram
listowner


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Protect your servers with 128-bit SSL encryption! Grab your copy of VeriSign's FREE guide: "Securing Your Website for business" Get it Now!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/M.WTOC/m1FDAA/cosFAA/DiTxlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/