Re: Digest Number 316
demondriver44
Tuesday, July 2, 2002 8:38 AM
Thanks Andrew,I find the Chicago system fascinatin.'I'll do some more
reading when I get some time.Meanwhile back in the Queen City of the
South I went out to work this morning early and came across a Combino
at St.Georges and Scotchmer on the down at 0545ish on test,later in
the day 983 made an appearance in Spencer St.showing Special[not
Sorry,not in Service],only saw it at a distance but it appears to
have had a bit of a touch up with the paint brush,pretty soon we are
going to have more variety in tramcars than we've had for a
while,can't wait.Regards all Peter Bruce.PS.any Melbourne tram
fans,I'm going into the old railfans pub,the Grosvenor Tavern,in
Equitable Place in the City on Thursday night,I'll be there after
about 7pm,any takers?? --- In TramsDownUnder@y..., "David Young"
<dayoung007@h...> wrote:
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
reading when I get some time.Meanwhile back in the Queen City of the
South I went out to work this morning early and came across a Combino
at St.Georges and Scotchmer on the down at 0545ish on test,later in
the day 983 made an appearance in Spencer St.showing Special[not
Sorry,not in Service],only saw it at a distance but it appears to
have had a bit of a touch up with the paint brush,pretty soon we are
going to have more variety in tramcars than we've had for a
while,can't wait.Regards all Peter Bruce.PS.any Melbourne tram
fans,I'm going into the old railfans pub,the Grosvenor Tavern,in
Equitable Place in the City on Thursday night,I'll be there after
about 7pm,any takers?? --- In TramsDownUnder@y..., "David Young"
<dayoung007@h...> wrote:
,maybe you can enlighten me about CSL,I assumed that it was aunified system
and within the Chicago city boundaries connecting in various placeswith
other tramway entities,is this so?Thanks,Peter Bruce.more than a
CSL. Sort of yes, sort of no. Yes, unified on paper, yet it was
paper transaction requirement that saw CSL order cars for itselfboth in the
name of Chicago Railways Co. and in the name of the Chicago CityRailway Co.
right up to the last PCCs--which the new CTA, (which brought in theEL lines
and abolished the CRCo. and CCRCo. among other things) immediatelytried to
cancel and then instead had virtually the lot recycled into PCC Elcars (new
bodies, but all parts, trucks, motors, controls, and the rest fromPCC
streetcars.)agreement
Prior to 1930, I guess this was a surface manifestation of the
which combined these and other underlying companies into the CSL,but with
CSL's bankruptcy in 1930 these odd inconvenient quirks were frozeninto
quasi-permanence so the receiver and the bankruptcy judge couldpreserve the
assets intact before deciding whether to liquidate, sell or re-organize.
http://mobile.msn.com
A. D. Young
_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device:
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/