RE: Re: little systems and big systems
Roy Winslow
Friday, June 28, 2002 12:19 AM
Was
Chicago under one ownership? I was thinking of 'unified' systems, such as London
(eventually owned and operated by one entity), and Leningrad/Sydney (always
under a single owner/operator).
In
terms of cable trams, Melbourne is often regarded as having the largest single
'system' in the world, although it is possible that Chicago was larger in
physical terms, although there were a number of operators, I presume most
of whom were in competition?
Roy
-----Original Message-------- In TramsDownUnder@y..., "demondriver44" <demondriver44@y...>
From: adyoung63141 [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 10:00 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [TramsDownUnder] Re: little systems and big systems
wrote:
> Roy,re large systems,I would have thought that Chicago Surface Lines
> at its peak would be the winner,it was a huge system.
But when was Chicago ever a part of the British Empire?
A. D. Young
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.