Re: sightings
citadis
Friday, June 14, 2002 12:24 PM
--- In TramsDownUnder@y..., "Roy Winslow" <rwinslow@b...> wrote:
Hi Roy,
You are quite correct in the amount of track left, of which a large
amount would still be in good condition, Queen street was not one
though as, it was the first done in concrete in 1933 and was
absolutely wornout when the system was murdered. The rest is far more
recent and, in general, Brisbane track was in excellent condition
right to the end, just being under bitumen would not hurt the rail,
stuff uncovered , like already mentioned, depends on what it was like
when it closed (I would suggest Geelongs' would have been quite
worn), some, like Dallas (and Stockholm) had badly corroded webs and
this has been the cause of their problems.
Cheers
Greg
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Will You Find True Love?
Will You Meet the One?
Free Love Reading by phone!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/Deo18C/zDLEAA/Ey.GAA/DiTxlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
The aborted Bristram project by the former Queensland NationalParty Govt
proposed to use substantial sections of former track as an economymeasure.
One downfall of this in the Brisbane context would be thelimitations on
tramcar geometry due to the relatively smaller track centrescarried over
from the horse tram days. OTOH, much of Brisbane's track was in massclosure, so
concrete and track replacement continued until 12 months before
a lot of the track lurking under the bitumen in Brisbane wouldcertainly not
be classed as life expired. In 1990, it was estimated that abouthalf the
system was still under bitumen. It was much cheaper to seal overthe top
than remove the track entirely and the job could be done muchquicker in an
environment where there was considerable community objection to theSydney,
replacement of the trams. For instance, the track in Pitt Street,
last used on a Saturday night in 1957 was completely covered overby nice
new bitumen by the Monday morning, as boasted by the Sydney MorningHerald!
Roy
Hi Roy,
You are quite correct in the amount of track left, of which a large
amount would still be in good condition, Queen street was not one
though as, it was the first done in concrete in 1933 and was
absolutely wornout when the system was murdered. The rest is far more
recent and, in general, Brisbane track was in excellent condition
right to the end, just being under bitumen would not hurt the rail,
stuff uncovered , like already mentioned, depends on what it was like
when it closed (I would suggest Geelongs' would have been quite
worn), some, like Dallas (and Stockholm) had badly corroded webs and
this has been the cause of their problems.
Cheers
Greg
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Will You Find True Love?
Will You Meet the One?
Free Love Reading by phone!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/Deo18C/zDLEAA/Ey.GAA/DiTxlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/