Re: Tram sightings today

Maybe it would be seen as Y not providing a service as a means of
profit? ie: Delay their own trams, get charged by the gov for not
providing service, pass the bill to M plus an "admin" fee. If this
was the case I'm sure there would be fines for this, therefore, it
would be in the interest of Y to clear the track and charge
a "removal and services" fee.
DingDing
Jack

A more interesting question would be, how would the fines be paid

if

a M>tram tram breaks down (say at Casino) and holds up route 96,

109

and 112 trams? I think YT would bill M>Tram for the fines that it
incurs. Also, would a) YT send someone to fix it and/or shunt it

out

of the way at Southbank Depot or b) M>Tram send someone to fix it?

cheers
Johann

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Buy Stock for $4
and no minimums.
FREE Money 2002.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/orkH0C/n97DAA/Ey.GAA/DiTxlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/