Re: "Little" and "Big" cars (was: Re: Melbourne 881 971 in depot)

IS Edit
Friday, April 19, 2002 10:40 AM

We coulda called them that over in Essendon except we had one or two W-2s with RC controllers with short handles so you wouldn't crack your elbow on the back wall of the cabin so often.
 
Bob Murphy
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 7:56 PM
Subject: [TramsDownUnder] "Little" and "Big" cars (was: Re: Melbourne 881 971 in depot)

-Murph,at South it was K35s and Big Cars,sometimes K35s were known as
Bombs,as in" what car have we got?"  "we've got a Bomb,437,its a
shitheap".PB.-- In TramsDownUnder@y..., "Peter D. Ehrlich"
<norcalrr@s...> wrote:
> In a message dated 17 April 2002 @ 0633 PST, "IS Edit"
> <bobmurphy2@c...> wrote:
>
> <[snipped]>

> > We used to refer to them as big cars and small cars, the small
ones being the
> > W-2s which were narrower inside and had much less room in the
driver cabs.
> >
> > By the time I drove for the M&MTB both the big and small cars
were basically
> > standardised, anyway. Little cars had K-35 controllers (mostly)
and big cars
> > had RC controllers. Little cars rode like shitwagons mostly and
the big cars
> > had nice suspension.
>
> Oh, I don't know about the W2s "little cars" riding like
shitwagons.  While
> I've never ridden a W5-7 class "big car" I, and most other motormen
who
> operate our W2, 496, are amazed at how smooth it rides--especially
compared
> to our other vintage cars such as Car 1 and New Orleans 952.  The
W2's MCB
> trucks and smaller wheels make it seem like it glides.
>
> Milantram


Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙