Re: Melbourne 881 971 in depot
Herman R. Silbiger
Wednesday, April 17, 2002 12:24 PM
In the future I'll just refer to this type as W.
Why have these "class" designations anyway? Why not refer to them by
number, such as 800s etc. like they do in most of the rest of the world?
Herman
Malcolm Miles wrote:
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Buy Stock for $4
and no minimums.
FREE Money 2002.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/orkH0C/n97DAA/ySSFAA/DiTxlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Why have these "class" designations anyway? Why not refer to them by
number, such as 800s etc. like they do in most of the rest of the world?
Herman
Malcolm Miles wrote:
On Wed, 17 Apr 2002 21:25:53 +1000 (EST), you wrote:To add even more to the confusion there were some W5s
that started as "CW5's" - built on old maximum
traction trucks to save money during the 30's Not
surprisingly they were a resounding failure and
converted to W5 fairly quickly - they carried numbers
681 to 685.
Not that quickly. They were built in 1935 and not converted to W5s
until 1956.
--
Best wishes,
Malcolm
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Buy Stock for $4
and no minimums.
FREE Money 2002.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/orkH0C/n97DAA/ySSFAA/DiTxlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/