Re: Melbourne W6 975

--- In TramsDownUnder@y..., David Langley <del@a...> wrote:

This is probably the time to comment on the fact that the present
operators have chosen to go back to this through routing but rather

than

give it its traditional route number 10 they have elected to go with
112. Anyone any thoughts on this? Is it possibly because nobody in

the

present company knows anything about route numbers currently unused.

I'll have a stab at it... =)... they didn't want to confuse people
who catch 11 or 12, so making it 112 has part of each of the two
routes?

Johann


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Save Time & Money
Outsource Your Web Design & Development with Elance
Post Your Project for FREE
http://us.click.yahoo.com/kXNj8C/V.zDAA/cosFAA/DiTxlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/