Re: 180 off track
Mal Rowe
Tuesday, February 26, 2002 11:36 AM
--- IS Edit <[email protected]> wrote: > Yep.
Looks interesting.
Long wheelbase trucks generally rode better at speed.
Single truck cars with normal short wheelbase trucks
tended to pitch fore and aft at speed. (Good fun when
riding Ballarat and Bendigo cars late at night in the
old SEC days!)
I've attached technical info for the mechanical
engineers amongst us.
Source is the 1917 edition of Dover's "Electric
Traction" from Victoria's State Library. (Probably
still there somewhere - but I copied this in the mid
'60's)
Mal
http://movies.yahoo.com.au - Yahoo! Movies
- Vote for your nominees in our online Oscars pool.
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Buy Stock for $4.
No Minimums.
FREE Money 2002.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/BgmYkB/VovDAA/ySSFAA/DiTxlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Looks interesting.
Was it a good truck, generally?
Long wheelbase trucks generally rode better at speed.
Single truck cars with normal short wheelbase trucks
tended to pitch fore and aft at speed. (Good fun when
riding Ballarat and Bendigo cars late at night in the
old SEC days!)
I've attached technical info for the mechanical
engineers amongst us.
Source is the 1917 edition of Dover's "Electric
Traction" from Victoria's State Library. (Probably
still there somewhere - but I copied this in the mid
'60's)
Mal
http://movies.yahoo.com.au - Yahoo! Movies
- Vote for your nominees in our online Oscars pool.
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Buy Stock for $4.
No Minimums.
FREE Money 2002.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/BgmYkB/VovDAA/ySSFAA/DiTxlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


