Re: Bugger,too many pixels
demondriver44
Monday, February 25, 2002 12:10 PM
Yeah,agreed Murph,but at the same time I like to get an idea of the
whole photo,I'm quite happy to do that myself though.By the way
TDUs,I've put a few of Graemes photos in the photo section[with his
OK],I'll do some more soon,and urge others to do so with their
pictures too,Mal those Essendon shots would be ideal,its too hard to
search back through the messages for a particular shot.I didn't know
about that Moonee Valley working Mal but I was a southside trammie
and I barrack for Melbourne and don't go to the races.Does the
caption on the photo mean it was taken in 1966?Regards,Peter Bruce.---
In TramsDownUnder@y..., "IS Edit" <bobmurphy2@c...> wrote:
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
whole photo,I'm quite happy to do that myself though.By the way
TDUs,I've put a few of Graemes photos in the photo section[with his
OK],I'll do some more soon,and urge others to do so with their
pictures too,Mal those Essendon shots would be ideal,its too hard to
search back through the messages for a particular shot.I didn't know
about that Moonee Valley working Mal but I was a southside trammie
and I barrack for Melbourne and don't go to the races.Does the
caption on the photo mean it was taken in 1966?Regards,Peter Bruce.---
In TramsDownUnder@y..., "IS Edit" <bobmurphy2@c...> wrote:
I like them big to catch the detail, Peter.
No one dicky about the size but Graeme.
You paying by the minute on the net, Graeme?
Keep 'em coming, please.
Great shots.
Bob Murphy
----- Original Message -----
From: peter bruce
To: TramsDownUnder@y...
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 8:43 PM
Subject: [TramsDownUnder] Bugger,too many pixels
Graeme,you don't need to rescan,just resize thus.PBruce.
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/