Re: Re: W 2 class trams

IS Edit
Monday, December 24, 2001 12:04 AM

Good point, Peter.

I bet the Tramways Union would have been against them.

The real name of that union was the Australian Motor Omnibus and Employees
Association.

I had a top secret security clearance in the US Army in the mid-60s and I
remember the DD-398 form "Application for Security Clearance" had a list of
what they termed "subversive organisations" on it. You had to indicate if
you had ever belonged to any of them. The only Australian organisation
listed was the ATMO&EA because it was considered Maoist because of their
Secretary Clarrie O'Shea.

Bob Murphy
----- Original Message -----
From: "groompg" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, December 24, 2001 10:07 AM
Subject: [TramsDownUnder] Re: W 2 class trams


--- In TramsDownUnder@y..., "IS Edit" <isedit@g...> wrote:
. . . No matter how good it was to read,
it was a failure.
. . .

Of course, a modern tramcar cost more to build (like it had
DOORS!); seems to me like a failure in imagination on the part
of M&MTB! They could have at least have run up some more
W2s for Collins and gone with Y derivatives for later builds.

Not as much fun to ride as a W on a nice day, but mighty
welcome on a cool, wet one! Maybe too easy to one-man??

Peter Groom





Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/




------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Access Your PC from Anywhere - Full setup in 2 minutes - Free Download
http://us.click.yahoo.com/1GUySC/E6eDAA/ySSFAA/DiTxlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙