--- InTramsDownUnder@..., "grahamj661" <graleenj@...> wrote:
>

> --- InTramsDownUnder@..., "ferriquinoligist" <gbparsons03@> wrote:

> >

> > Unfortuunately 980 has "buckley;'s" hope of being returned to service,unless a proper fundraising scheme & business plan is drawn up.

> > It will be a very expensive operation.

> > Had it been converted to a conventional tram in 1972,it would still be running today on City Circle Duties.

> > It is 60 years old in 2010.

> > Gary

>

>

> >

> Well if thats all it needs, what's stopping you. Oh I forgot it needs money too.

>

> How about you draw up the business plan, devise a fundraising scheme, and put in the first few thousand dollars yourself, then if everybody else on TDU does likewise, that would be a good start. And if all the comments on this thread were directed at a positive outcome instead of a negative (and as usual vented to discredit the organisation which owns the vehicle concerned) then things might happen.

>

> grahamj661

>


I don't believe my reply in this thread was negative or trying to discredit the TMSV, so please don't generalise and say "all".

Regards,
Chris