Re: Newcastle light rail built by inner-west light rail manufacturer suspended due to fault
  Tony Galloway

Ah, that makes all the difference then. “100” sounds much more impressive than “3”.

Like this :

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4xgx4k83zzc https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4xgx4k83zzc

Tony

> On 26 Nov 2021, at 4:19 pm, Matthew Geier matthew@...> wrote:

>

> On 26/11/21 16:13, Tony Galloway wrote:

>> “A mechanical problem” - nothing to see here, move along now.

>>

>> Must be more than one with it, though it seems to be the trams rather than the power switching as Matthew suggested.

>>

>> I see they’re calling them Urbos 100s now. Wonder what the changes were compared to the Urbos 3s, apart from the batteries.

>

> No difference at all, it's a marketing thing, 100 means 100% low floor, to differentiate it from the 70% low floor version of the Urbos 3 (it's now Urbos 70)

>

> The Newcastle trams, being a later build than Sydney do have a few mechanical and software changes as well as being fitted with the ACR units - there is a gap on the roof of the Sydney cars where the ACR modules would go.

>

> I've not been able to look at the roof of a Canberra car (Canberra is too flat :-), but there is a circuit breaker next to the driver labeled 'ACR control'. I assume there is a gap on the roof where the ACR kit will go.

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> --

> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TramsDownUnder" group.

> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email totramsdownunder+unsubscribe@... mailto:tramsdownunder+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tramsdownunder/1a5b3450-99cd-141f-8fb0-db6eb453ec55%40sleeper.apana.org.au https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tramsdownunder/1a5b3450-99cd-141f-8fb0-db6eb453ec55%40sleeper.apana.org.au?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer.