And I can only spot one bare head.
On Sun, 10 Oct 2021 at 12:48, espee8800 espee8800@...> wrote:
> Lovely picture even if a bit fizzy on the edges. One non tram thing to
> notice is the goodly number of women going to work in the city and also
> notice not one of them is wearing trousers. No cross-dressing back then.
>
> On Sun, 10 Oct 2021 at 12:32, Mal Rowe mal.rowe@...> wrote:
>
>> On 10/10/2021 10:24, TP wrote:
>> >
>> https://scontent.fsyd4-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/245154598_4673348519394658_7320123285429844938_n.jpg?_nc_cat=103&ccb=1-5&_nc_sid=825194&_nc_ohc=UxineggH8CAAX9FeaNb&_nc_ht=scontent.fsyd4-1.fna&oh=29a3968a41bed1763d1ecf5dcd45a96d&oe=61666F07
>> >
>> Thanks Tony.
>>
>> Not a great picture of the trams, but it does show some interesting
>> detail about the routes at that time.
>>
>
>
> --
>
> cheers and best wishes,
> David in Avenel.au,
> [Before you change anything, learn why it is the way it is.]
>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "TramsDownUnder" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email totramsdownunder+unsubscribe@....
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tramsdownunder/CAGmZ6yOq0z1w8h-iKO6H_sN-z9C5dp4rV1fHNTDd7ursyQUz1A%40mail.gmail.com
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tramsdownunder/CAGmZ6yOq0z1w8h-iKO6H_sN-z9C5dp4rV1fHNTDd7ursyQUz1A%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer
> .
>