What I was going to say that the next step up (requiring two extra modules
because of the extra bogie on one end) would be a 40+ metre tram, too long
for Melbourne.
Tony P
On Monday, 3 May 2021 at 16:49:12 UTC+10 TP wrote:
> That would be a very untidy extension with a mixture of lengths, some
> requiring two bogies, and random door placements.
>
> Tony P
>
> On Monday, 3 May 2021 at 15:55:36 UTC+10 Matthew Geier wrote:
>
>> On 3/5/21 3:50 pm, TP wrote:
>> > The layout of this short 26 metre version of the E class would not be
>> > amenable to adding additional modules later because of the need to add
>> > an additional bogie to support the centre of the two module vehicle.
>> > It would look like this:
>> >
>> An extra module can be added easily. It just has one bogie like the
>> leading module in the illustration. You could have 'n' number of modules
>> all with one bogie, except the last one. I'm not sure how stable this
>> configuration would be, it may need some creative yaw damping.
>>
>> I note that in the UK there have been a spate of yaw damper mounting
>> point cracks on railway rolling stock, two different CAF builds and the
>> Hitachi IEC trains have suffered yaw damper problems.
>>
>>
>>
>>