I would suggest that the Toronto overview is based much more on aspirations than reality.
Toronto over the last decade has moved from an exemplary system to one beset with problems, political (google the anti light rail and heavy rail/metro bastardry of the Ford brothers), insufficient funding, failure to maintain technical and operational management capability and inability to adopt to modern LR processes.
The introduction of the newest Bombardier cars has been a management and production disaster with deliveries approaching 5 years behind schedule and excessive numbers of cars being returned to Bombardier for reworking and rectification of major defects/failure to meet performance guarantees.
The upgrading and replacement of infrastructure is taking forever with works that Melbourne would complete in a minimal number of days/weeks taking 6 months or more and the TTC seeming to have no concern for of the economic damage being created by the disruptions to major city streets etc.
In spite of the delays in putting the new LRVs into service withdrawal of the old cars has not been slowed down and as a consequence bustitution of major sections of the trolley system has been undertaken and is continuing to occur.
Despite the planned changes to pantograph compatible overhead as anticipated in the ordering of the new LRVs and despite the excessive delays in the delivery of the new LRVs it has been necessary for the TTC to order at extra cost the retrofitting of trolley poles to a significant percentage of the new LRVs. The overhead conversion program is still unfinished.
Melbourne may not be perfect but currently it is way ahead of Toronto in system performance and service delivery.
Greg
who but for COVID would have been in Toronto in August 2020.
On 20/04/2021 8:39 am, TP wrote:
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PSNp_n_-O04
>
> This bloke has previously done a similar video comparing Sydney and Toronto rail systems that some of you may have seen. It's a bit of a revelation to me because I haven't studied Toronto in detail for about a decade and it's obvious that they've been putting a huge amount of effort and money into modernising the system, whereas Melbourne has remained quite stagnant. In particular, Toronto's patronage has soured to being within barking distance of Melbourne's. Once, Toronto would not rate comparison with the great tram systems of the world. Now it's a serious contender right up amongst them.
>
> The neglect of the Melbourne tram system is a depressing thing for those of us who would like to see it prosper and the neglect comes from both political sides - but nothing more disappointing that the Andrews government after the expectations raised when the East-West link road was cancelled when they came to government. On top of this, the political alternative is uninspiring. Feel sorry for you guys down there. So much potential but ....
>
> In unrelated news, new Paris line T9 has just opened, increasing the route length of the combined Paris lines to 137 km. It's run by Citadis X05 trams like Sydney's, but seven-section (45 metres). Almost the entire line is a straight line, so the trams shouldn't be too challenged although it's still a tad slow for the distance.
>
> https://www.urban-transport-magazine.com/en/paris-inaugurates-new-tram-line-t9/
>
> Tony P
> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TramsDownUnder" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email totramsdownunder+unsubscribe@... mailto:tramsdownunder+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tramsdownunder/c08ef4f3-c5d1-4ba4-9824-a1864a5be1f8n%40googlegroups.com https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tramsdownunder/c08ef4f3-c5d1-4ba4-9824-a1864a5be1f8n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer.