Re: Re: 2087 at Comeng.
  Stuart Keenan

Now now Dear, it sounds like you need a Bex and a lie down.😁

S

On Tue, Apr 6, 2021, 10:26 Bob Pearce probert@...> wrote:

> As I understand the situation, it was a political move by the NSW Govt

> because the people of NSW would (probably) not accept the trams were NOT ok

> for Sydney, but quite suitable for Melbourne.

>

>

>

> It seems that the only people who didn’t believe the trams were okay for

> Sydney was the Govt., everyone else was quite happy with them.

>

>

>

> Like Brisbane, it was only after the trams had gone, was it realised what

> a an absolute balls-up the decision made to the road traffic.

>

>

>

> It wasn’t because the buses couldn’t cope which they couldn’t but those

> who had bought and were using cars, wouldn’t leave them at home thereby

> contributing to the debacle on the roads; bit like today really to some

> degree.

>

>

>

> With the extension of the railway north to Yanchep now being built, I am

> curious as to where the traffic jam that seems to go as far out as the next

> extension of the freeway goes, actually starts.

>

> So far it seems, for every extension of the freeway, and for every extra

> lane provided, more road traffic travels on it and the traffic jam gets

> closer to the new freeway start each time.

>

>

>

> I am rapidly thinking that the harder it is to use the roads, the quicker

> the cretins might change to PT, especially rail. It just doesn’t seem to be

> happening, no matter how difficult it is to get through the morning or

> evening peaks, that’s the issue.

>

>

>

> Perhaps a charge for one person cars might be in order…………..

>

>

>

> Oh heavens, wot I wrote.

>

>

>

> Bob in Perth

>

>

>

> *From:*tramsdownunder@... tramsdownunder@...> *On

> Behalf Of *TP

> *Sent:* Tuesday, 6 April 2021 7:57 AM

> *To:* TramsDownUnder tramsdownunder@...>

> *Subject:* [TramsDownUnder] Re: 2087 at Comeng.

>

>

>

> That's a Comeng photo by the way. More of these in Dunn's book.

>

>

>

> Tony P

>

>

>

> On Tuesday, 6 April 2021 at 09:56:27 UTC+10 TP wrote:

>

> The shame is that Melbourne didn't take them - a more modern-looking,

> comfortable and better-designed tram than the Ws of the time.

>

>

>

> Tony P

>

>

>

> On Tuesday, 6 April 2021 at 08:52:30 UTC+10 Michael Giddey wrote:

>

> Uploaded from Pinterest. Sydney's last traditional tram nearing completion

> at Comeng's works at Clyde. It was to have been the 100th car of 250 but

> the rest of the order was cancelled at enormous penalty costs. It didn't

> survive until the end of the system less than 8 years later. It was burnt

> after a comparatively minor argument with a truck. Some older W cars are

> still running in Melbourne. What a waste! STM has sister cars 2001 and 2044.

>

>

>

> Sent from Outlook http://aka.ms/weboutlook

>

> --

> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

> "TramsDownUnder" group.

> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an

> email totramsdownunder+unsubscribe@....

> To view this discussion on the web visit

> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tramsdownunder/24849b1c-0b0d-43fa-9f25-d6a60bca42bcn%40googlegroups.com

> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tramsdownunder/24849b1c-0b0d-43fa-9f25-d6a60bca42bcn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer

> .

>

> --

> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

> "TramsDownUnder" group.

> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an

> email totramsdownunder+unsubscribe@....

> To view this discussion on the web visit

> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tramsdownunder/!%26!AAAAAAAAAAAYAAAAAAAAANRI7VTqU3JFnERogu%2BjMZDCgAAAEAAAAFAm3vW4dIxHlrs4223coroBAAAAAA%3D%3D%40iinet.net.au

> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tramsdownunder/!%26!AAAAAAAAAAAYAAAAAAAAANRI7VTqU3JFnERogu%2BjMZDCgAAAEAAAAFAm3vW4dIxHlrs4223coroBAAAAAA%3D%3D%40iinet.net.au?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer

> .

>