Re: Inside another tram
  Mal Rowe

On 08/07/2020 12:28, Radcliffe, John (L&W, Waite Campus) wrote:
> Original. It was always there when in MTT traffic. (That is why the car was selected rather than an Adelaide D car.)

>

Very nice.

I understand that one reason these cars were so unpopular with the
P&MTT, the HTT and the MMTB is that (unlike the Adelaide version built
by Pengelley) they didn't have counterbalned sliding door on the cross
bench section, with the result that conductors were often squashed by
sliding doors as the cars accelerated and decelerated.

I wonder if 192 had the counter balancing mechanism fitted after the
'return home'.

I guess the related question is when the aisle was cut through the cross
bench seats.

Mal Rowe - still learning