Mal as i have said the rest of the depot can house them as well.As i also
said if you were to re jig the carpark you could get the more in and just
like the shed roads the outside ones are longer than the middle ones,so
qhen the depot went all Z in 87 each group of roads was 4,3,4 plus a topper
or lockcar in the old language,and if they were to lose some Z's or shared
rolling stock as i outlined it would be a viable option.

On Sat, 4 Jul. 2020, 18:06 Mal Rowe, mal.rowe@...> wrote:

> On 04/07/2020 17:23, Timothy Strait wrote:

> >

> > Sorry guys,but Essendon could have E's on the 59 if the

> > powers that be wanted them to.

>

> > E's can fit on every rd at Essendon except for 12 rd which is a tight

> > squeeze but could be used if in a pinch.

>

> > 6051 tested clearances 2 years ago at most depots and there were no

> > major problems.he outside roads at Essendon could house at least 10

> > plus 2 each on most shed rds.

>

> Check again Tim.

>

> I attach another satellite view - this time showing Essendon Depot -

> with a scale.

>

> The roads are around 57m long - so no more than one 33m long E class per

> road - leaving 22m for either a B or a Z.

>

> That's not enough trams to run the service.

>

> Mal Rowe - who has done the homework and has a couple of solutions to

> put to his local MP

>

> --

> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

> "TramsDownUnder" group.

> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an

> email totramsdownunder+unsubscribe@....

> To view this discussion on the web visit

> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tramsdownunder/31f3d57b-b36f-0e87-9abd-10abab9299a8%40gmail.com

> .

>