If the business case was good, it should be possible to get money from banks, or the semi-banks, or the insurance companies who
invest millions, or anyone else with money and looking for a good investment.

If the business case was not good, then one must ask if the economics case really justifies the tramway.

And one must also ask if there is any way that capital need not be spent on some items at present - leaving them for future
development if and when really needed.

And one must also ask if it could be possible to do the job in a different manner, with the same or nearly the same outcome, but
much lower cost.

Trouble is we have only seen the general outline of the project, with little or no detail other than the number of tram stops.

Regards

Dudley Horscroft
----- Original Message -----
From: "Prescott" lenkaprescott@...>
To: "TramsDownUnder" tramsdownunder@...>
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2019 5:31 AM
Subject: [TramsDownUnder] Re: State Treasurer regrets no LR extension money in Budget: Gold Coast Bulletin.

> I've never seen any FB watermarks.

>

> Queensland should pay for this project itself considering the low cost of

> it. They're just playing petty political games with the feds.

>

> Tony P

>

> --

> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TramsDownUnder" group.

> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email totramsdownunder+unsubscribe@....

> To post to this group, send email totramsdownunder@....

> To view this discussion on the web visit

> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tramsdownunder/773a4204-c9a1-4650-855e-f7cfa519127d%40googlegroups.com.

> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

>