Hi tim i find it stupid that 2113 wasn't used in Sydney because 13 is
supposed to be unlucky 001 in Newcastle makes sense to me also have they
chosen numbers for Sydney X05 citadis trams?

On Sun, 5 Aug 2018, 18:06 Tim Boxsell timbo247@...> wrote:

> G'day all, well this is a real head scratcher ! I have a bee in my bonnet

> about fleet/road numbers.

>

> The new Newcastle tram on it's way down south to Oz already has it's fleet

> number 2151 proudly painted /applied on the roofline.

>

> Wondering why they chose 2151, could have been just 001.

>

> The Varios when they arrived had their numbers on already, but the GCLR

> trams & the X05s didn't till later.

>

> Why is this ? The new Canberra trams have their numbers applied after

> arrival too.

>

> I know it's not really that important in the general scheme of things, but

> those of us pedantic enough for details get a bit mift!

>

> Me thinks I see a trip up north in the coming months. (The wife's gonna

> love that, not !)

>

> At least I have free accommodation at my auntie's place.

>

> Gotta go now & have a bex and a good lie down.

>

> Tim, in Sydney.

>

> --

> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

> "TramsDownUnder" group.

> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an

> email totramsdownunder+unsubscribe@....

> To post to this group, send email totramsdownunder@....

> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

>