> On 5 Jun 2017, at 3:01 pm, Rubberman92rubberman92@... [TramsDownUnder] TramsDownUnder@...> wrote:

>

> In fact, what should happen is that the service authorities get a bill for the excess cost over the price of "no dig" works.


Why would you do that when the whole point of loading all these external costs on to the LR tab is to inflate the construction price so high that any future LR proposals are dismissed out of hand as “too expensive” ?

We’re talking about Sydney, NSW here - not Integrityland.

Tony G