Re: ''Too wide and long'': Work starts next year to make line big enough for new trains
  Robert Taaffe

No matter who they got "off the shelf" trains from there probably would
have been a need for loading gauge enhancement. The only really suitable
train replacement, for my mind, were the Sadlier family of Swiss DD. What a
pity we did not get them.

There are still a few other tight spots around, such as the points in front
of Gosford signal box.

Bob T

On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 2:58 PM, 'Brian'bblunt@...
[TramsDownUnder] TramsDownUnder@...> wrote:

>

>

> I think they can get a Tangara or Oscar to Springwood. Beyond is the

> problem:.

>

> https://www.transport.nsw.gov.au/projects/current-projects/

> new-intercity-fleet-program-springwood-to-lithgow-rail-corridor

>

>

>

> ----- Original Message -----

> From:

>TramsDownUnder@...

>

> To:

> "tramsdownunder@yahoogroups.com" tramsdownunder@...>

> Cc:

>

> Sent:

> Fri, 11 Aug 2017 04:37:10 +0000

>

> Subject:

> Re: [TramsDownUnder] 'Too wide and long': Work starts next year to make

> line big enough for new trains

>

>

>

>

> So to bring a Tangara to say Springwood would they just need to replace

> signals and cut the platforms back.

> Would much cutting back of platforms need to be done and if so at what

> stations?

>

> Regards

> Geoffrey

> ------------------------------

> *From:*TramsDownUnder@... TramsDownUnder@...>

> on behalf of Matthew Geiermatthew@... [TramsDownUnder] <

>TramsDownUnder@...>

> *Sent:* Friday, August 11, 2017 1:21:44 PM

> *To:*TramsDownUnder@...

> *Subject:* Re: [TramsDownUnder] 'Too wide and long': Work starts next

> year to make line big enough for new trains

>

>

>

> On 11/08/17 10:53, Robert Taaffertaaffe9@... [TramsDownUnder]

> wrote:

> >

> >

> > Most engineers DO NOT GO into such ventures with their eyes closed and

> > you can bet that the track alterations were in the original submission.

>

> That the engineers made.

>

> Doesn't mean the politicians that called for the order to be made even

> looked at the engineers report or even cared.

> All they care about is the next press release.

>

> Implementation is some one else's problem.

>

> I quite believe that at the political level, originally no money was

> allocated for gauge enhancement.

>

> Sooner or later gauge enhancement work would have been needed, the other

> two routes out of Sydney under the wires were widened out years ago to

> take medium width stock, only Katoomba west had been ignored. Until now.

>

> It wouldn't have been such an issue if Baird hadn't made a song-n-dance

> about saving money by buying 'standard off the shelf trains'. By doing

> so the politicians have set them selves up for ridicule when the media

> latch onto the gauge enhancement works required. So much for cheaper

> 'off the shelf' trains if you have to spend money else where to make the

> tracks fit them.

>

> Even if the whole concept of buying cheaper 'standard' trains is a sound

> idea, and that the gauge enhancement really is needed to bring that line

> up to a common standard, put the two together with the way the

> government went on about their 'savings by using standard trains' and

> they have a media feeding frenzy about inappropriate spending and poor

> budgeting / project management. Any merits of the original proposals get

> lost.

>

>

>